Q Reflect on how decisions were made during the Team Project. Describe how you made decisions in a 4-page (maximum) double-spaced paper. Describe the following: 1. Process for decision making 2. Quantitative or qualitative nature of decisions 3. System 1- or System 2-type thinking 4. Integrative nature of decisions 5. Benefits of collaboration 6. Theory for thinking – is it reflective, integrative, system, perception-based, values-based, or design thinking? 7. How you will strive to make decisions in the future Due Dates • Unit 8: Individually written Paper on Decision Making o Due by 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT. Rubric Individually Written Paper Individually Written Paper Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 53 to >47.66 pts Excellent All components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed. The content reflects graduate-level execution with clear evidence of critical thinking, synthesis of relevant information from credible sources, and clear mastery of the concepts necessary to successfully execute each component of the assignment. The content is logically organized and contains only that information necessary meet the expectations of the assignment and does not contain content that could be considered superfluous or distracting. All arguments, recommendation, and positions are logically presented and properly supported with credible or scholarly sources. The submission includes PowerPoint slides or an Excel spreadsheet if required in the assignment directions. 47.66 to >42.36 pts Good Most of the components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed. There are some aspects of the assignment that appear to have been implicitly addressed. The content mostly reflects a graduate-level effort in the execution. While there is evidence of critical thinking, synthesis of information from credible sources it isn’t consistent throughout the submission. It appears that the student was somewhat comfortable with many of the concepts necessary to successfully complete each component of the assignment. The content is mostly organized in a logical manner; however, it contains some content which could be considered superfluous and mildly distracting. Most of the arguments, recommendations, and positions are logically present and supported with credible and scholarly sources. The submission includes PowerPoint slides or an Excel spreadsheet if required in the assignment directions. 42.36 to >0 pts Fair Few of the components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed. Most of the components were either implicitly addressed or not covered. The content is not consistent with what would typically associate with a graduate leaner. There is little evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of credible sources to support the completion of the assignment. It appears that the student has little to not understanding of the concepts necessary to successfully address the components of the assignment. The content isn’t well organized and difficult to follow. It contains a large amount of content which considered superfluous and distracting. Few of the arguments, recommendations, or positions are logically presented and supported with appropriate sources. The submission does not include PowerPoint slides or an Excel spreadsheet if required in the assignment directions. 53 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 10 to >8.95 pts Excellent Those elements of the assignment that are required to adhere to the APA writing style are prepared consistent with the APA Manual (7th edition) and include a title and reference page. Note: The instructor may require adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project. The sources are properly in-text cited and listed in a reference page consistent with the APA Manual (7th edition). The submission contains very few or no grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors. 8.95 to >7.95 pts Good Those elements of the assignment that are required to adhere to the APA writing style are mostly consistent with the APA Manual (7th edition) and include a title and reference page. Note: The instructor may require adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project. The sources are mostly in-text cited and properly listed in the reference page consistent with the APA Manual (7th edition). The submission contains some grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors. 7.95 to >0 pts Fair Those elements of the assignment that are required to adhere to the APA writing style contain a large number of inconsistencies with the APA Manual (7th edition). Note: The instructor may require adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project. The sources aren’t properly in-text cited and listed in the reference page consistent with the APA Manual (7th edition). The submission is poorly written and contains a large number of grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 5 to >4.5 pts Excellent The submission meets the length requirements as specified within the assignment expectations. 4.5 to >4.0 pts Good The submission is slightly outside page length requirements as specified within the assignment expectations. As a result, the student may have struggled to fully meet all of the assignment expectations. 4 to >0 pts Fair The submission is not consistent with the page length requirement as specified within the assignment expectations. As a result, the student was largely unsuccessful in meeting the assignment expectations. 5 pts Total Points: 68 PreviousNext